
Share
As Dave Friedman's analysis shows, fluctuating utilization rates across key GPU models like A100 SXM4, H100 SXM, and H200 reveal hidden market pressures driving price volatility beyond simple supply issues.
The narrative around GPU shortages often simplifies a complex market into a binary state-either the supply is tight, or it isn't. However, this oversimplification masks the nuanced dynamics at play within different GPU models and their respective markets. A recent analysis by Dave Friedman, using proprietary data from Ornn, reveals that utilization rates are a critical predictor of future volatility in GPU spot prices. This article delves into the findings for three prominent GPUs: A100 SXM4, H100 SXM, and H200.
Understanding the relationship between GPU utilization and price volatility is crucial for investors, data center operators, and AI infrastructure providers. High utilization can signal impending market instability, which can inform strategic decisions such as inventory management, pricing strategies, and risk mitigation. For instance, if a GPU model's utilization rate spikes, stakeholders can anticipate higher price volatility in the coming weeks and adjust their operations accordingly.
Friedman analyzed 90 days of Q4 2025 data (October 2 through December 30) for the A100 SXM4, H100 SXM, and H200 GPUs. Each model's dataset included daily spot prices, a 7-day realized volatility series, and utilization percentages. The primary question was whether today’s utilization could predict future volatility.

To test this, Friedman compared utilization on day ( t ) with volatility on day ( t+7 ). This approach avoids the overlap created by rolling windows and assesses whether current tightness signals future turbulence. He also tested 3-day and 14-day horizons to ensure the relationship was consistent across different timescales.
For the H200 model, the correlation between utilization and next-week volatility is +0.46 (p < 0.0001). A simple linear regression reveals an R² of approximately 0.21, indicating that utilization explains about 21% of the variance in future volatility. This is a significant finding for a single variable in noisy market data.
The slope of the regression line is +0.74 volatility points per 1% increase in utilization. For example, moving from 40% to 70% utilization corresponds to an approximate +22 volatility points the following week.
Breaking down the data into quartiles:
This represents a 3.5 times higher volatility in tight market conditions.
The relationship holds across different time horizons:
The signal peaks at a 7-day horizon.
The findings from this analysis underscore the importance
Tags
Original Sources
↗ https://davefriedman.substack.com/p/three-gpu-markets-three-volatility?utm_source=tldrai
About the author
Marcus began tracking AI's market implications in 2016, noticing AI-related patent filings accelerating ahead of earnings upgrades before most of the sell-side had caught on. A former fixed-income quantitative analyst, he spent two decades building models that priced risk across emerging markets before pivoting to cover the economic impact of AI full-time. His writing translates opaque technical developments into clear risk/reward terms — and he's rarely diplomatic about the gap between AI valuations and underlying fundamentals. He believes most market participants still underestimate AI's long-run deflationary effect on knowledge work.
More from The Analyst →This Week's Edition
5 January 2026
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories