
Share
As artificial intelligence integrates deeper into healthcare, a new council aims to monitor AI performance beyond initial deployment to safeguard patient well-being.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has the potential to revolutionize how we diagnose and treat patients. However, with great power comes great responsibility. Waleed Mohsen, cofounder and CEO of Verbal AI Technologies, highlights a critical gap in current oversight: what happens after AI systems are deployed and start interacting with real patients at scale.
Mohsen is leading the charge to address this issue through the Council for Healthcare AI Responsibility and Safety (CHAIRS). The council's primary focus is on post-deployment monitoring, ensuring that AI systems continue to adhere to clinical protocols once they are in live use. "Healthcare puts nearly all of its AI oversight into the moment before deployment, then stops watching at the moment the risk actually starts," Mohsen said.
Pre-deployment validation, procurement reviews, algorithm committees, and regulatory clearance are essential steps that healthcare organizations take to ensure the safety and effectiveness of AI tools. However, these processes typically assess technology at a specific point in time and do not account for how the AI performs over thousands of real-world patient encounters.
Mohsen compares this oversight gap to accrediting a hospital based on its plans before opening and then never returning to inspect actual care. "AI gets the deal no hospital would get: a careful evaluation in a controlled setting before go-live, then nothing watching actual performance," he explained. AI systems can operate at volumes far beyond human capacity, making it crucial to monitor their performance continuously.
Verbal AI Technologies, Mohsen's company, specializes in independently auditing patient interactions involving both humans and AI. This experience has informed the formation of CHAIRS, where healthcare quality, compliance, and safety leaders will shape the council's agenda, findings, and recommendations.

The stakes are high when it comes to AI in healthcare. The use of AI can significantly improve productivity and the effectiveness of care delivery, allowing healthcare systems to provide better patient outcomes. However, if not properly monitored, AI systems can also introduce new risks and errors that could harm patients.
CHAIRS aims to bridge this gap by examining aggregate failure patterns from live deployments. By doing so, the council hopes to identify common issues and develop best practices for ongoing monitoring and improvement. "We need to ensure that AI systems are not only effective but also safe and ethical in their interactions with patients," Mohsen emphasized.
The public's trust in AI is essential for its widespread adoption in healthcare. As AI scales, it becomes increasingly important to demonstrate transparency and accountability. CHAIRS' efforts will play a crucial role in building this trust by providing evidence of how AI actually performs in live patient encounters, not just before implementation.
In the coming months, CHAIRS will work closely with healthcare organizations, regulators, and technology providers to establish robust post-deployment monitoring frameworks. The goal is to create a safer, more reliable healthcare environment where AI can fulfill its potential to improve patient care while minimizing risks.
Tags
Original Sources
New healthcare AI council prioritizes governance beyond go-live
↗ https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/new-healthcare-ai-council-prioritizes-governance-beyond-go-live
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
17 August 2026
113 articles
Related Articles

FDA Panel Rejects Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Drug, FTC Sues Hims & Hers for Data Sharing
Policy & Regulation · 3 min

FTC Sues Hims & Hers Over Privacy Breaches and Misleading Practices
Policy & Regulation · 4 min

HRSA Revises Controversial 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program Despite Provider Opposition
Policy & Regulation · 3 min
Related Articles

FDA Panel Rejects Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Drug, FTC Sues Hims & Hers for Data Sharing
Policy & Regulation · 3 min

FTC Sues Hims & Hers Over Privacy Breaches and Misleading Practices
Policy & Regulation · 4 min

HRSA Revises Controversial 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program Despite Provider Opposition
Policy & Regulation · 3 min
More Stories
© 2026 Cedar & Bloom. All rights reserved.