
Share
Elon Musk's departure from OpenAI reveals deep divides over the future direction and control of AGI development, raising questions about who will guide humanity through this technological frontier.
March 5, 2024
OpenAI, the leading artificial intelligence research organization, has released a detailed account of its relationship with co-founder Elon Musk, highlighting significant financial and structural disagreements that led to his departure from the company. The mission of OpenAI is to ensure that advanced general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity, but achieving this goal required more resources than initially anticipated.
OpenAI's journey to develop AGI has been marked by substantial funding challenges and strategic shifts. Understanding these dynamics provides insight into the complexities of pursuing cutting-edge AI research and the importance of aligning mission with governance structures.
In late 2015, OpenAI was founded with a vision to build safe and beneficial AGI. Initially, co-founders Greg Brockman and Sam Altman planned to raise $100 million. However, Elon Musk, who was also a co-founder, suggested in an email that the organization should announce a much larger funding commitment of $1 billion to avoid "sounding hopeless." He offered to cover any shortfall left by other donors.
Despite this ambitious goal, OpenAI has raised less than $45 million from Musk and more than $90 million from other sources. This discrepancy underscores the initial underestimation of the resources required for AGI development.
By early 2017, it became clear to OpenAI that building AGI would require vast amounts of computational power. The organization began calculating the compute requirements and realized that billions of dollars per year would be necessary-far more than initially anticipated. This realization led to a critical reassessment of their funding strategy.

In late 2017, OpenAI and Musk discussed transitioning from a non-profit to a for-profit entity to secure the needed resources. Musk wanted majority equity, initial board control, and to serve as CEO. However, these terms were unacceptable to OpenAI, which believed that no single individual should have absolute control over the organization.
Musk then suggested merging OpenAI with Tesla, arguing that Tesla was the only viable path to compete with Google/DeepMind. In an email forwarded in early February 2018, Musk wrote, "OpenAI should attach to Tesla as its cash cow," adding that while the probability of being a counterweight to Google was small, it was not zero.
Unable to agree on terms for a for-profit structure or a merger with Tesla, Musk chose to leave OpenAI. He stated that a relevant competitor to Google/DeepMind was necessary and that he would pursue this goal independently. Reid Hoffman, an early investor, stepped in to bridge the funding gap during this period.
OpenAI remains committed to its mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity, despite the challenges and changes in leadership. The organization continues to pursue groundbreaking research while navigating the complex landscape of AI development.
Tags
Original Sources
About the author
Marcus began tracking AI's market implications in 2016, noticing AI-related patent filings accelerating ahead of earnings upgrades before most of the sell-side had caught on. A former fixed-income quantitative analyst, he spent two decades building models that priced risk across emerging markets before pivoting to cover the economic impact of AI full-time. His writing translates opaque technical developments into clear risk/reward terms — and he's rarely diplomatic about the gap between AI valuations and underlying fundamentals. He believes most market participants still underestimate AI's long-run deflationary effect on knowledge work.
More from The Analyst →This Week's Edition
6 March 2024
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories