
Share
As tech leaders like Sam Altman and Masayoshi Son predict a future where artificial superintelligence surpasses human brainpower, we explore the current state of AI and what needs to happen for these predictions to become reality.
OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, has been vocal about the potential for achieving superintelligent AI in the near future. In a blog post last year, he stated that this milestone could be within reach soon. Similarly, Masayoshi Son, Chairman of SoftBank and AI venture Stargate, predicted during a 2024 shareholder meeting that artificial superintelligence (ASI) could surpass human brainpower by 10,000 times by 2035. These bold claims have sparked both excitement and skepticism in the tech community.
However, before we can talk about ASI, it's crucial to understand the current state of AI and the steps that need to be taken. Currently, all existing AI falls under artificial narrow intelligence (ANI), which is designed to perform specific tasks with high efficiency but lacks general cognitive abilities. To reach superintelligence, we first need to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI), where AI can match human-level cognition across a wide range of tasks.
ANI systems are specialized for particular tasks and operate within predefined constraints. Examples include chatbots, recommendation engines, and self-driving cars. These systems excel in their designated domains but lack the flexibility to adapt to new or unforeseen scenarios without human intervention.
AGI represents a significant leap from ANI. It aims to create AI systems that can understand, learn, and apply knowledge across various domains, much like human intelligence. Achieving AGI would require advancements in several key areas:
Despite significant progress in ANI, achieving AGI remains a formidable challenge. Some of the key obstacles include:

While Altman and Son are optimistic about the timeline for achieving AGI and ASI, not everyone shares their enthusiasm. Brent Smolinski, AI Leader at Kearney, has expressed skepticism in a LinkedIn article, stating that "it is still likely that we may never achieve superintelligence." His concerns highlight the need for careful consideration of the technical, ethical, and practical challenges.
OpenAI is taking a cautious approach to model development, emphasizing monitoring, alignment, and security. They are implementing new safeguards to ensure that frontier AI models are developed responsibly. This includes:
As we work towards AGI, the practical applications of advanced ANI systems continue to expand. Splitting AI tasks into "plan with a big/frontier model, execute with a small/cheap model" has shown promise in improving efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This approach allows for sophisticated planning while keeping execution lightweight and scalable.
The journey towards AGI and ASI raises important ethical and societal questions. As AI systems become more intelligent, they will need to be designed with transparency, accountability, and fairness in mind. Collaborative efforts between researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders are essential to navigate these challenges.
While the path to artificial superintelligence is fraught with technical and ethical hurdles, the progress in ANI and the ongoing research towards AGI offer exciting possibilities. As we continue to push the boundaries of AI, it's crucial to balance innovation with responsibility to ensure that the benefits of advanced AI are realized safely and equitably.
Tags
Original Sources
How close are we to AI superintelligence? The 3 types of AI, explained
↗ https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/how-close-are-we-to-ai-superintelligence-the-3-types-of-ai-explained/ss-AA1XsHnH
About the author
Kai built ML infrastructure at a Bay Area startup before developing an obsession with transformer architectures and inference optimisation that eventually pulled him out of product work entirely. A stint at a compute research lab sharpened his instinct for what actually matters in a model release versus what is marketing. He writes from the inside — from the perspective of someone who has debugged the systems he is describing at three in the morning. He is allergic to hype and instinctively drawn to the unglamorous plumbing questions that everyone else skips over.
More from The Engineer →This Week's Edition
24 August 2026
55 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories
© 2026 Cedar & Bloom. All rights reserved.