
Share
Aspiring software engineers like Jonathan Kim face daunting odds, applying to hundreds of jobs post-bootcamp only to encounter the growing influence of AI in hiring and coding processes.
In a world where technology is advancing at breakneck speed, the promise of a lucrative career in software engineering has lured many into coding bootcamps. However, as artificial intelligence (AI) continues to reshape industries, the path from coding bootcamp graduate to employed software engineer is becoming increasingly fraught with challenges.
Jonathan Kim, a 29-year-old aspiring software engineer from Los Angeles, is one of many facing these obstacles. Over 50 weeks, he applied for more than 600 software engineering jobs, meticulously tracking his efforts on a spreadsheet. Out of those applications, only six companies responded, and just two provided him with a technical screening. None extended an offer.
This wasn't the outcome Kim anticipated when he paid nearly $20,000 in 2023 for an intensive part-time coding bootcamp. "They sold a fake dream of a great job market," Kim said, reflecting on his decision. Without a college degree, he currently works at his uncle's ice cream shop while continuing his job search and contributing to open-source software projects to bolster his resume. "I see so much doom and gloom throughout everything; it’s hard to stay positive."
Kim's experience is not unique. Coding bootcamps have long been seen as a viable alternative for those seeking entry into the tech industry, offering non-traditional candidates a pathway to six-figure engineering jobs. However, the rise of AI has dramatically altered this landscape.
"All coding bootcamps were already on their way out, but AI has been the nail in the coffin," said Allison Baum Gates, a general partner at venture capital fund SemperVirens and an early employee at bootcamp pioneer General Assembly. She noted that even before AI's surge, bootcamps were facing challenges due to market saturation, evolving employer demands, and increased international hiring.

The Codesmith bootcamp Kim attended is emblematic of this shift. According to recent data, only 37% of its graduates are finding employment in software engineering roles. This statistic underscores the broader trend: AI's ability to automate tasks that were once the domain of entry-level developers has significantly reduced the demand for new hires in these positions.
AI's impact on coding can be likened to a powerful tool that both simplifies and complicates the job market. On one hand, it streamlines processes and enhances productivity, making it easier for experienced engineers to tackle complex problems. On the other hand, it eliminates the need for many entry-level roles, leaving aspiring developers like Kim in a difficult position.
For those who have invested time and money in coding bootcamps, the situation is particularly challenging. The promise of quick entry into the tech industry has given way to a reality where even basic programming tasks are being automated. This shift not only affects new graduates but also raises questions about the future of coding education and job placement.
Despite these challenges, there are still opportunities for those who can adapt. Contributing to open-source projects, as Kim is doing, can help build a strong portfolio and demonstrate real-world skills. Additionally, focusing on areas where AI has not yet fully penetrated, such as specialized software development or niche industries, may offer more stable career paths.
The story of coding bootcamps and the job market they serve is one of rapid change and adaptation. As AI continues to evolve, it will be crucial for both educators and learners to stay ahead of the curve, identifying new skills and areas of expertise that remain in demand.
Tags
Original Sources
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
11 August 2025
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories