
Share
As healthcare costs continue to rise, a new study reveals that consumer trust in commercial health plans is waning, highlighting the need for better communication and more meaningful support from insurers.
The relationship between Americans and their commercial health insurance plans is under strain. According to a recent report by J.D. Power, fewer than one-third of people with commercial coverage view their plans as trusted partners in their health journey. The ongoing healthcare cost crisis has significantly eroded consumer trust, with many enrollees feeling that insurers prioritize cost containment over their well-being.
J.D. Power's annual survey of attitudes toward commercial health plans found a satisfaction score of 562 on a 1,000-point scale. This represents a slight decline from the previous year and a more significant drop from two years ago. While the scores have remained largely steady, the underlying issues are far from stable.
One of the primary drivers of declining trust is the rising cost of healthcare. More than half (53%) of survey respondents reported an increase in their insurance premiums, while 34% noted higher deductibles. These financial burdens not only strain household budgets but also contribute to a sense of dissatisfaction and mistrust among plan members.
"By and large, health plans are delivering on the basics, but many are failing to deliver more meaningful emotional connections with their members," said Meaghan Hafner, senior director of healthcare solutions at J.D. Power, in an announcement. "Health plan members want to feel like their insurer is a trusted partner in their health and wellness."
One area where insurers can make significant improvements is claims resolution. The survey found that only 30% of members reported having either a perfect or excellent experience with the claims process. Members who rated their claims resolution as "excellent" had satisfaction scores 120 points higher than those who said it was "great," and 330 points higher than those who described it as "good," "just okay," or "poor."

The data suggests that a more efficient and transparent claims process can greatly enhance member satisfaction. Insurers should focus on reducing processing times, providing clear communication about claim statuses, and ensuring that disputes are resolved fairly and promptly.
AI technologies are also playing a role in streamlining healthcare billing and prior authorization processes. According to a recent post by URAC, AI is helping to automate these tasks, potentially reducing administrative burdens and improving the overall member experience. However, as with any technological advancement, there are important questions about cost and accessibility that need to be addressed.
The erosion of trust in commercial health plans has broader implications for society. When people feel unsupported by their insurers, they may delay seeking necessary medical care or avoid it altogether due to financial concerns. This can lead to worse health outcomes and higher long-term costs for both individuals and the healthcare system as a whole.
The workforce impact cannot be overlooked. Employers who sponsor health plans are increasingly concerned about the well-being of their employees. High premiums and deductibles can strain household finances, affecting employee morale and productivity. Some companies are exploring alternative models, such as subscription services, to provide more affordable and comprehensive coverage.
Ultimately, improving member satisfaction requires a multifaceted approach. Insurers must focus on building stronger emotional connections with their members, ensuring clear communication, and delivering consistently positive experiences. By addressing these issues, health plans can regain the trust of their enrollees and contribute to a healthier, more resilient society.
Tags
Original Sources
JD Power: Cost pressures worsen member experience with commercial plans
↗ https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/jd-power-cost-pressures-worsen-member-experience-commercial-plans
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
3 June 2026
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories