
Share
The Federal Trade Commission is investigating the nation’s largest electronic health records vendor, raising concerns about anticompetitive practices and patient data access.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is conducting a broad inquiry into potential violations of antitrust law by Epic Systems Corp., the leading provider of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States. According to sources recently contacted by FTC investigators, the agency is closely examining Epic’s business practices, particularly its use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and other tactics that could stifle competition.
This investigation underscores the growing scrutiny of tech giants in the healthcare sector, where market dominance can have significant implications for patient care and data privacy. Epic, which serves over half of all U.S. Hospitals, has long been a target of criticism from competitors and healthcare providers who argue that its practices hinder interoperability and innovation.
The FTC's inquiry is part of a broader effort to ensure fair competition in the tech industry, where a handful of companies often wield outsized influence. Epic, known for its comprehensive EHR platform, has been accused of using NDAs and other restrictive practices to limit how its customers can share patient data with third-party developers and other healthcare providers.
"Epic's alleged anti-competitive practices under scrutiny from federal, state investigators," according to a recent report on Threads by STAT News. The company has denied these claims, stating that it is committed to interoperability and does not engage in anticompetitive behavior. An Epic spokesperson emphasized, "We're leaders in interoperability to support patient care, and we do not engage in anticompetitive behavior."
However, critics argue that Epic’s control over access to patient records gives it an unfair advantage. Healthcare providers, rather than Epic, are the ones who ultimately decide how data is shared, but the company's contracts often contain clauses that make it difficult for providers to share data freely.

The implications of this investigation extend beyond just business competition. Patient care and data privacy are at the heart of the matter. If Epic’s practices are found to be anticompetitive, it could lead to significant changes in how healthcare data is managed and shared, potentially improving patient outcomes and innovation in healthcare technology.
For patients, the ability to easily transfer their medical records between different providers can mean faster and more accurate diagnoses, as well as better-coordinated care. For healthcare providers, interoperable systems can reduce administrative burdens and improve efficiency. However, if Epic’s practices are found to be anticompetitive, it could also lead to increased regulatory oversight of the entire EHR industry.
The FTC's investigation is still in its early stages, and it remains to be seen what actions, if any, will be taken against Epic. If the agency finds evidence of antitrust violations, it could result in fines, forced changes to business practices, or even legal action. This would not only impact Epic but also set a precedent for how other tech companies in the healthcare sector are regulated.
In the meantime, the debate over data access and interoperability continues. As more stakeholders weigh in, including patient advocacy groups and technology innovators, the FTC’s findings could shape the future of healthcare technology and policy. For now, the eyes of the industry-and patients-are on Epic as this investigation unfolds.
Tags
Original Sources
Epic’s alleged anticompetitive practices under scrutiny from federal, state investigators
↗ https://www.statnews.com/2026/08/14/epic-systems-ftc-review-nda-use-possible-anticompetitive-practices
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
24 August 2026
55 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories
© 2026 Cedar & Bloom. All rights reserved.