
Share
GPT-5 Pro has debunked a long-standing theory in computer science, presenting a counterexample that challenges the NICD-with-erasures majority optimality conjecture and ushers in new possibilities for research.
GPT-5 Pro, the latest iteration of OpenAI's language model series, has made a significant contribution to theoretical computer science by finding a counterexample to the NICD-with-erasures majority optimality conjecture. This conjecture is part of a list of open problems compiled by the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing (Simons list, p.25). The discovery not only highlights the model's capabilities in solving complex mathematical problems but also opens new avenues for research in this area.
The NICD-with-erasures majority optimality conjecture posits that under certain conditions, the majority function is optimal for a specific type of decision-making problem. Specifically, it deals with functions ( f: {-1, 1}^n \to {-1, 1} ) and their expected values when some inputs are erased (i.e., set to zero). The conjecture suggests that the majority function should have the highest expected value in these scenarios.
However, GPT-5 Pro found a counterexample at ( p = 0.4 ) and ( n = 5 ), where the function:
[ f(x) = \text{sign}(x_1 - 3x_2 + x_3 - x_4 + 3x_5) ]
yields an expected value of ( E|f(x)| = 0.43024 ), which is higher than the best majority function's expected value of ( 0.42904 ).

This discovery has several implications for researchers and practitioners in theoretical computer science and AI:
To verify this result, researchers can implement the function ( f(x) ) and simulate the expected value calculation under the given conditions. The steps would involve:
The discovery by GPT-5 Pro of a counterexample to the NICD-with-erasures majority optimality conjecture is a significant milestone in theoretical computer science. It not only challenges existing assumptions but also opens new avenues for research and algorithm design. For practitioners, this finding underscores the importance of continuously testing and validating theoretical models,
Tags
Original Sources
About the author
Kai built ML infrastructure at a Bay Area startup before developing an obsession with transformer architectures and inference optimisation that eventually pulled him out of product work entirely. A stint at a compute research lab sharpened his instinct for what actually matters in a model release versus what is marketing. He writes from the inside — from the perspective of someone who has debugged the systems he is describing at three in the morning. He is allergic to hype and instinctively drawn to the unglamorous plumbing questions that everyone else skips over.
More from The Engineer →This Week's Edition
7 October 2025
88 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories