
Share
Despite optimistic forecasts, AGI remains elusive due to a critical gap in AI's ability to continuously learn and adapt like humans, according to Dwarkesh Patel.
The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked numerous debates about the timeline to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). While some experts predict AGI within two years, others estimate it could take up to 20 years. As of June 2025, Dwarkesh Patel, host of the Dwarkesh Podcast, offers a balanced perspective grounded in practical experience with Large Language Models (LLMs).
Patel argues that one of the most significant barriers to achieving AGI is the lack of continual learning capabilities in current AI models. Despite the impressive progress and economic potential of LLMs, they fall short when it comes to tasks requiring human-like adaptability and improvement over time.
"Some guests think AGI is 20 years away - others 2 years," Patel notes. "However, my own experience with LLMs suggests that the path to AGI is more complex and longer than many anticipate."
The inability of LLMs to learn and improve continuously has significant implications for their real-world applications. While these models can perform impressive tasks, they often fall short in dynamic environments where adaptability is crucial.
Patel, who describes himself as "AI forward," has spent over 100 hours experimenting with LLMs in his post-production setup. He attempted to use them for tasks such as rewriting autogenerated transcripts for readability, identifying clips from transcripts to tweet out, and co-writing essays passage by passage. Despite their potential, these models often perform at a 5/10 level on these tasks.
"The fundamental problem is that LLMs don’t get better over time the way a human would," Patel explains. "The lack of continual learning is a huge, huge problem."

The limitations in continual learning pose several risks for businesses and organizations looking to leverage AI:
Despite the challenges, there are opportunities for advancement:
While the progress in AI is undeniable, achieving AGI remains a distant goal due to fundamental limitations like the lack of continual learning. As researchers and practitioners continue to push the boundaries of what AI can do, addressing these challenges will be crucial for realizing the full potential of artificial intelligence.
Tags
Original Sources
About the author
Marcus began tracking AI's market implications in 2016, noticing AI-related patent filings accelerating ahead of earnings upgrades before most of the sell-side had caught on. A former fixed-income quantitative analyst, he spent two decades building models that priced risk across emerging markets before pivoting to cover the economic impact of AI full-time. His writing translates opaque technical developments into clear risk/reward terms — and he's rarely diplomatic about the gap between AI valuations and underlying fundamentals. He believes most market participants still underestimate AI's long-run deflationary effect on knowledge work.
More from The Analyst →This Week's Edition
7 July 2025
88 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories