
Share
Former FDA regulators warn of lingering impacts from last year's massive layoffs, cautioning that rebuilding trust and expertise is essential as the agency hires thousands of new staff.
In the wake of last year’s controversial layoffs at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the agency is now facing a significant challenge: rebuilding its workforce. The cuts, which saw around 3,500 employees let go, were initially defended by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a necessary step to reduce bureaucratic bloat. However, as the FDA aims to hire more than 3,200 new staff members-including scientific reviewers and investigators-leaders are starting to realize that re-establishing trust and retaining talent will be crucial for the agency’s future success.
As of late April, the FDA has managed to bring on board about 350 new employees. This number falls far short of the goal, raising concerns among both current and former regulators about the long-term impact on public health and safety. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon acknowledged that earning the trust of staff is now a top priority. “The FDA is actively investing in its workforce to ensure continuity of expertise and prevent the loss of critical institutional knowledge,” he said.
The layoffs have had far-reaching consequences, particularly in areas where the FDA plays a crucial role in protecting public health. Former regulators, who spoke to STAT on condition of anonymity, expressed deep concern about the agency’s ability to fulfill its mission effectively. One former senior scientist, who spent over two decades at the FDA, described the situation as a “disaster.”
“I didn’t leave the FDA; the FDA left me,” said the former scientist. “The expertise and institutional memory that were lost cannot be easily replaced. It’s like trying to rebuild a house after a fire without having the blueprints.”
Another former regulator, who worked in drug safety, emphasized the potential risks of a diminished workforce. “The FDA is responsible for ensuring that drugs and medical devices are safe and effective before they reach consumers,” she said. “With fewer staff, there’s a higher risk of oversight lapses, which could lead to dangerous products entering the market.”

As the FDA moves forward with its hiring efforts, several key points will be critical to watch:
Recruitment and Retention: The agency must not only attract new talent but also retain it. This will require addressing concerns about job security, work conditions, and career growth opportunities.
Training and Development: New hires will need extensive training to bring them up to speed on the complex processes and regulations that govern the FDA’s operations. Ensuring a smooth transition will be essential to maintaining the agency’s effectiveness.
Rebuilding Trust: Re-establishing trust with both current employees and the broader public will be crucial. This involves transparent communication about the steps being taken to improve the agency and address past issues.
Institutional Memory: The loss of experienced staff means that a significant amount of institutional knowledge has been lost. Efforts must be made to document best practices and lessons learned from previous years to prevent history from repeating itself.
Public Health Impact: Ultimately, the success of the FDA’s rebuilding efforts will be measured by its ability to protect public health. This includes ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, medical devices, and other products regulated by the agency.
The road ahead for the FDA is long and challenging, but the stakes are high. As the agency works to rebuild its workforce and restore trust, the well-being of millions of Americans depends on its ability to navigate these challenges successfully.
Tags
Original Sources
What was lost at the FDA
↗ https://www.statnews.com/2026/05/07/fda-rebuilding-after-doge-former-regulators-speaking-out
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
7 May 2026
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories