
Share
In an era where artificial intelligence is reshaping society, Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas" provides a compelling framework for ethical development and human-centered technology.
In May 2026, Pope Leo XIV released his groundbreaking encyclical, "Magnifica Humanitas" ("Magnificent Humanity"), which addresses the profound implications of artificial intelligence on society. The document is more than just a religious treatise; it's a clarion call to technologists, policymakers, and everyday citizens to approach AI with moral clarity and collective responsibility.
The pope’s message is clear: technology is never neutral. It carries the values and intentions of those who create and use it. As we stand at the threshold of an era defined by AI, the choices we make today will shape our future in ways that echo the most significant transformations in human history.
In the encyclical, Pope Leo XIV draws a stark contrast between two paths: the Tower of Babel and the rebuilding of Jerusalem. The Tower of Babel is a cautionary tale of hubris and disconnection from fundamental values, leading to fragmentation and failure. On the other hand, the rebuilding of Jerusalem represents a collaborative effort grounded in shared responsibility and a commitment to the common good.
The pope’s encyclical emphasizes that AI should not be seen as an autonomous force but rather as a tool shaped by human hands and guided by human values. This perspective is crucial for policymakers and technologists who often view AI through a lens of technical efficiency and economic gain, sometimes at the expense of ethical considerations.
Pope Leo XIV’s call to action is particularly resonant in light of recent developments. The Catholic Church has announced a partnership with Anthropic, an AI research company, to ensure that the development of AI aligns with moral principles. This collaboration aims to create guidelines and frameworks that prioritize human dignity, social justice, and environmental sustainability.

The encyclical also highlights the importance of inclusivity and shared responsibility. Just as the rebuilding of Jerusalem involved men, women, priests, artisans, heads of households, and young people, the development of AI must engage a diverse array of stakeholders. This approach ensures that the benefits and risks of AI are equitably distributed and that no one is left behind.
The stakes are high. The decisions we make about AI will have far-reaching consequences for our society, economy, and environment. If we allow AI to be driven solely by profit motives and technological prowess without a moral compass, we risk replicating the failures of the past-inequality, social division, and environmental degradation.
Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical offers a timely reminder that technology is not an end in itself but a means to achieve greater human flourishing. By grounding AI development in ethical principles, we can build a future where technology serves humanity rather than the other way around.
As we navigate this new frontier, it is essential to foster a global conversation about AI ethics and governance. This includes robust regulatory frameworks, transparent decision-making processes, and public engagement. Only through such efforts can we ensure that AI becomes a force for good, contributing to the rebuilding of our common humanity rather than leading us down the path of the Tower of Babel.
In the end, the choice is ours. Will we allow technology to dictate our future, or will we shape it with wisdom and compassion? The pope’s encyclical provides a roadmap for making that choice wisely.
Tags
Original Sources
How the Pope’s Magnifica Humanitas offers a template for individuals to meet the AI moment
↗ https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/05/29/1138107/how-the-popes-magnifica-humanitas-offers-a-template-for-individuals-to-meet-the-ai-moment
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →This Week's Edition
3 June 2026
133 articles
Related Articles
Related Articles
More Stories