
Share
As AI integrates deeper into daily life, experts warn of a subtle shift toward psychological reliance, drawing parallels to traditional addictions and sparking new debates in recovery circles.
When people hear the word "addiction," they often assume it implies catastrophe. But addiction is a gradual process, one that starts with optional use and evolves into psychological reliance. This shift isn't limited to substances like drugs or alcohol; it can also apply to our growing dependence on artificial intelligence (AI).
Jonathan Avery, vice chair for addiction psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medicine and host of the podcast "Thriving With Addiction," has noticed a surprising trend. Listeners who usually debate the merits of 12-step programs or medication-assisted treatment are now discussing AI's role in their lives. This shift highlights how technology is increasingly becoming a source of both comfort and concern.
In one recent episode, Avery explored the parallels between AI dependence and traditional addiction. The response was overwhelming, with listeners sharing personal stories about their own struggles with AI. Some found solace in chatbots for mental health support, while others felt trapped by algorithms that kept them engaged for hours on end.
The human brain is wired to seek out rewards and avoid pain. This biological drive can lead to addiction when it involves substances or behaviors that provide immediate gratification. AI, with its ability to offer instant solutions and personalized interactions, taps into the same reward pathways.
For example, a person might turn to an AI chatbot for emotional support during a stressful period. Over time, this interaction becomes a source of comfort, and the brain starts to crave it. The user may feel anxious or irritable when unable to access the AI, similar to withdrawal symptoms experienced by substance users.

Avery points out that while AI can be beneficial, such as providing mental health support or educational resources, it also carries risks. "The same technology that helps someone manage anxiety could become a crutch," he says. "If you rely too heavily on an AI for emotional support, you might lose the ability to cope with stress independently."
The implications of AI dependence are far-reaching and affect not only individuals but also society as a whole. On a personal level, excessive reliance on AI can lead to social isolation, decreased resilience, and even mental health issues. At a societal level, it could exacerbate existing inequalities if access to beneficial AI tools is unevenly distributed.
Avery emphasizes the importance of balance. "We need to recognize the value that AI brings while also being mindful of its potential pitfalls," he says. This means fostering digital literacy and critical thinking skills, particularly in young people who are growing up with AI as a constant presence.
As we navigate this new landscape, it's crucial to develop guidelines and policies that promote healthy use of technology. This includes setting boundaries on screen time, encouraging face-to-face interactions, and supporting mental health resources that don't rely solely on AI.
The conversation around AI dependence is just beginning, but it's clear that the stakes are high. By understanding the psychological mechanisms at play and taking proactive steps, we can ensure that AI serves as a tool for empowerment rather than a source of addiction.
Tags
Original Sources
What addiction medicine can teach us about depending on AI
↗ https://www.statnews.com/2026/05/11/ai-dependence-addiction-substances-relief-psychology
About the author
Amara's entry point into AI was an epidemiology role at a London research hospital, where she spent five years studying how digital health tools reached — or conspicuously failed to reach — underserved communities. Watching early algorithmic systems in healthcare quietly entrench existing inequalities, she redirected her career toward the systemic consequences of AI at scale. She covers AI through an unflinching lens: who benefits, who bears the cost, and what evidence actually says versus what the press release claims. Her writing is calm and precise, but she doesn't mistake balance for neutrality.
More from The Steward →Related Articles
More Stories